You are browsing the archive for rants.

Parent View

October 20, 2011 in rants

20111020-043503.jpg

Parent View is the latest ‘bash your school’ idea from the present Government in the UK. It is a site that, in its simplest form, allows parents of children at any school in England to answer their views based on 12 questions about that school. Each question is rated from ‘strongly agree’ to ‘strongly disagree’ or if you are a non decider the ever ubiquitous ‘I don’t know’.
What is quite unbelievable is that anyone can register on the site and answer the questions about any school in England. How? Email addresses are not verified!
How can such an important site like this have left aside a basic security measure such as this? Who is actually in charge of it? What are they thinking?

I registered a false email at the site earlier to check and I was logged in as fast as I could press the submit key. This is not what I would expect to happen. I could search for any school and, if feeling vindictive, answer every question with strongly disagree. Here are the questions.

20111020-044704.jpg 20111020-044724.jpg

20111020-044730.jpg 20111020-044735.jpg

20111020-044740.jpg 20111020-044746.jpg

20111020-044751.jpg 20111020-044758.jpg

20111020-044803.jpg 20111020-044809.jpg

20111020-044814.jpg

20111020-044819.jpg

Ofsted MUST address this basic security flaw and I have emailed them with my concerns.
Allowing anyone to register and leave viewpoints will make a mockery of this badly judged and very unhelpful website.

Parent View

Revolution or evolution, ICT needs to change

September 11, 2010 in rants, thoughts

What next for ICT?

I just sat down to tackle a term plan for ICT (Information Communication Technology) and have found myself writing this instead. Why?

  1. Google was unleashed to the general public 12 years ago
  2. The current ICT program of study from the Revised National Curriculum was first published by the QCA (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority) 11 years ago

I started my teaching career in 1997, two years before the ICT program of study arrived in staff rooms throughout England. When the National Curriculum came along it was seen by many as evolutionary albeit prescriptive. The search engine ‘Google’ was unleashed to the public in 1998 and was seen by many as a revolution which went on to change the face of the internet forever. Google has evolved throughout those years and has become a much more useful and effective tool for teaching and learning. The ICT program of study hasn’t. It’s been floundering for many years as the technology around it has advanced and developed.

I'm not that old!

So, back to my term plan which is supposed to involve data analysis and complex searching of CD ROMs and the internet. CD what? Aren’t they those dust covered boxed items many schools have vast collections of stored away in cupboards? One of the requirements for ICT states that students should be taught

how to prepare information for development using ICT, including selecting suitable sources, finding information, classifying it and checking it for accuracy

and CD ROM’s are suggested as a source. I can’t remember the last time I used a CD ROM to search for information so why would  I expect my students to use them? I’m going to write a plan from scratch based on the tools that are available to me and my students today. I won’t consign CD ROM’s to the bin just yet as they will be useful from a historical point of view to help demonstrate how searching for information has evolved over the last 13 years.

But what about ICT in general? New government guidelines state that schools continue to use the 1999 National Curriculum for planning purposes and I suspect until revised changes are made many schools will be content to use the 1999/2003 QCA schemes of work. And that saddens me. The schemes were written to help non-technology minded teachers to put the National Curriculum requirements for ICT into place in their schools. It has worked for many years but it needs to evolve. Year in year out, I imagine many schools up and down the country have done nothing more than edit QCA schemes of work with a new date and class name along the top line, perhaps added the year’s new resources to the list and then ‘taught the same’ again. Meanwhile children in those classes respond with nonchalance and then go home to upload videos to Youtube, skype their friends and play games online with others across the world and wonder why ICT lessons at school are boring.

Are we doing them a disservice? I think so.

I better get back to my plan though. I’ll come back to this at another time and if you have anything to say about it please do leave a comment.

Rated PG

December 11, 2009 in rants

It's okay, it's only Night at the Museum 2 (@lbtyhill)

There was a time when teachers could be trusted to make decisions for the children in their class, to do what they thought was best for them, to help them achieve their potential, to get on with the job. That time seems so long ago it could be described as a myth.Teaching is teetering on the edge of being nothing more than a pen pushing, tick boxing, result achieving, league table rising profession if it were not for the many talented, selfless, hard working and inspirational teachers that continue to persevere against never ending governmental interference, so that they can keep the myth alive.

So what caused this rant today?

Apparently you have to seek parental permission if you wish to show a PG rated film to children in your class. It left me lost for words until now. Is this true? I checked the classification out.

Children of any age may watch a PG rated film or DVD, with or without an adult. A ‘PG’ film should not trouble or worry a child aged eight or older. However the PG does tell parents that the content of the film may upset younger or more sensitive children. cbbfc guidelines

So I’m asking, does your school have to seek parental permission to show PG rated films?


Click here to take survey

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...