Skip to main content

Google Glass in the classroom

Google Glass (Image from Google Glass site)


Google Glass appears in some eyes to be yet another 'shiny device' that schools and education consultants/sellers will jump on and proclaim as the next great device for education. I haven't seen Google Glass apart from the media presented online but I think the naysayers will get this one wrong. 

Education is littered with revolutionary and/or evolutionary technological devices:
  • The BBC Micro
  • PCs of varying age and quality
  • Macs
  • Visualisers
  • Interactive White Boards
  • Netbooks
  • Laptops
  • BeeBots
  • Smart Pens
  • Recorders
  • Tape Players
  • Video recorders
  • DVD players
  • Blu Ray players
  • Audio systems
  • Music Keyboards
  • Game Consoles
  • GPS devices
  • iPad, iPod devices
  • Android devices
The list could go on and on. Many of the devices have fans, many do not. There are those who see no educational benefit in having them whilst others will defend their use and offer research and evidence to back their views. 

Google Glass is a complete unknown. It hasn't even gotten into the public domain yet never mind schools. So how can we even consider it as a device that may or may not offer educational benefits? Will, there is no harm in speculating and that isn't too difficult considering Google Glass won't be a revolution but an evolution in terms of how we interact with technology.

If you have a look at the promotional video and read through the Google Glass 'What it does' site you will immediately recognise many features as an everyday standard in most modern devices. It can record video and take pictures, it captures audio, it can share that with others, it can give you directions, allows you to search online, you can speak to it, send messages and be given translations. Basically it's got many of the features of any mobile smart phone but you wear it on your head as it's a pair of glasses albeit ones with an amazing bit of technology attached. 
So how does it fit into a classroom considering one device costs $1500?

Google Glass costs $1500 now, although I'm guessing it won't cost that when it becomes a worldwide saleable product. I will stick my neck out and say that I can't see it becoming a whole class use device, that is, I could never envisage a class of children wearing Google Glass whilst in class. For now I see this as a device for educators  which could be used to capture evidence of learning unobtrusively. 

Will Google Glass become another expensive technological device consigned to cupboards? We'll have to wait and see.

Popular posts from this blog

How to use proxy setting with Linux Mint

The dreaded proxy server has reared its head again. If you read my post about Linux OS for old tech you would have found me advocating Ubuntu, Elementary and Linux Mint. Unfortunately, I have found Linux Mint to be problematic if your school server uses proxy settings to get online. Ubuntu and Elementary also require changes to the network settings if you use a proxy, but this only involves a simple change in the Network Settings panel. This doesn't work in Linux Mint, the settings can be entered but will not remain saved.

So, here's the 'how to' courtesy of the askUbuntu Q&A section - if you're not keen on using terminal commands I suggest you either don't bother using Linux Mint and stick to Ubuntu or Elementary (or any other Linux distro) or swallow your fears and give this a go.

Use terminal to open /etc/environment using a text edit app as superuser - e.g. interminal type sudo gedit /etc/environment     (enter password when asked)Add the following line…

My latest lesson observation feedback

This was the outcome of my latest lesson observation - I received Good with Outstanding features (whatever that actually means). The form is based on the 2013 Ofsted criteria for a whole school observation, such criteria is not meant to be used to grade individual lessons so why are schools doing exactly that?
To achieve an Outstanding grade on this form I would have needed to do the following in the length of time the lesson observation took place.  Almost all pupils make rapid and sustained progress across the curriculumMarking and feedback from the teacher and pupils is frequent and of consistently high qualityTeaching of reading, writing, communication and maths is exceptionalUse of well judged and often imaginative teaching strategies that match individual needsTime taken to develop skills in other subjectsAppropriate and regular homeworkNow to pick some of these apart. No teacher can possibly be expected to ensure all pupils make sustained and rapid progress across THECURRICULUM

Marking in primary schools is verging on the ridiculous

Marking in primary schools used to be done with a red pen or whatever colour happened to be closest at hand. I've even marked in pencil once, but most of that marking was rubbed out by the children. What's happened now however has been steadily creeping in over the last few years - red pen is seen as bad, a terrible colour to mark with. Children view it as negative even if their work is correct. Red is now a banned marking colour in many primary schools across the land and has been replaced with a plethora of colour coded marking schemes, all followed to the colour due to the ridiculous nature of some primary school marking policies.